MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972677383 · doi:10.7202/301209ar

Quelques enjeux en rapport avec la privatisation des services de santé et des services sociaux dans la conjoncture actuelle

2008· article· fr· W1972677383 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Yves Vaillancourt, Réjean Mathieu, Christian Jetté, Raymonde Bourque

Bibliographic record

VenueNouvelles pratiques sociales · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce texte reprend la section IX sur les enjeux d'un rapport d'étape d'une recherche en cours sur La privatisation des services de santé et des services sociaux au Québec en 1993 (Vaillancourt et al., 1993). Les principales conclusions de ce rapport d'étape ont été livrées en séance plénière par Yves Vaillancourt, lors de l'ouverture du Colloque sur la privatisation dans le réseau de la santé et des services sociaux tenu à Montréal du 11 au 13 février 1993 et auquel ont participé 350 personnes. Les sections centrales du rapport d'étape portent sur la privatisation dans l'hébergement des personnes âgées (section VI), dans les services à domicile (section VII et dans les services concernant la santé mentale et la déficience intellectuelle en contexte de désinstitutionnalisation (section VIII). Ajoutons que cette recherche en cours amènera la production d'un rapport final à l'automne 1993.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.517
Threshold uncertainty score0.971

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0090.006
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2008
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNouvelles pratiques socialesSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207