MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972683655 · doi:10.1021/ci100409y

Combined Receptor and Ligand-Based Approach to the Universal Pharmacophore Model Development for Studies of Drug Blockade to the hERG1 Pore Domain

2011· article· en· W1972683655 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chemical Information and Modeling · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsLibin Cardiovascular Institute of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordshERGPharmacophoreIn silicoQuantitative structure–activity relationshipDrugComputational biologyDrug discoveryDocking (animal)ChemistryPharmacologyStereochemistryMedicineBiologyBiochemistryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Long QT syndrome, LQTS, results in serious cardiovascular disorders, such as tachyarrhythmia and sudden cardiac death. A promiscuous binding of different drugs to the intracavitary binding site in the pore domain (PD) of human ether-a-go-go related gene (hERG) channels leads to a similar dysfunction, known as a drug-induced LQTS. Therefore, an assessment of the blocking ability for potent drugs is of great pragmatic value for molecular pharmacology and medicinal chemistry of hERGs. Thus, we attempted to create an in silico model aimed at blinded drug screening for their blocking ability to the hERG1 PD. Two distinct approaches to the drug blockage, ligand-based QSAR and receptor-based molecular docking methods, are combined for development of a universal pharmacophore model, which provides rapid assessment of drug blocking ability to the hERG1 channel. The best 3D-QSAR model (AAADR.7) from PHASE modeling was selected from a pool consisting of 44 initial candidates. The constructed model using 31 hERG blockers was validated with 9 test set compounds. The resulting model correctly predicted the pIC(50) values of test set compounds as true unknowns. To further evaluate the pharmacophore model, 14 hERG blockers with diverse hERG blocking potencies were selected from literature and they were used as additional external blind test sets. The resulting average deviation between in vitro and predicted pIC(50) values of external test set blockers is found as 0.29 suggesting that the model is able to accuretely predict the pIC(50) values as true unknowns. These pharmacophore models were merged with a previously developed atomistic receptor model for the hERG1 PD and exhibited a high consistency between ligand-based and receptor-based models. Therefore, the developed 3D-QSAR model provides a predictive tool for profiling candidate compounds before their synthesis. This model also indicated the key functional groups determining a high-affinity blockade of the hERG1 channel. To cross-validate consistency between the constructed hERG1 pore domain and the pharmacophore models, we performed docking studies using the homology model of hERG1. To understand how polar or nonpolar moieties of inhibitors stimulate channel inhibition, critical amino acid replacement (i.e., T623, S624, S649, Y652 and F656) at the hERG cavity was examined by in silico mutagenesis. The average docking score differences between wild type and mutated hERG channels was found to have the following order: F656A > Y652A > S624A > T623A > S649A. These results are in agreement with experimental data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.299
Threshold uncertainty score0.155

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it