MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972689662 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.69.184417

Two-magnon scattering in a self-assembled nanoscale network of misfit dislocations

2004· article· en· W1972689662 on OpenAlexaff
Georg Woltersdorf, B. Heinrich

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic properties of thin films
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCondensed matter physicsMagnonMaterials scienceScatteringFerromagnetic resonanceLaser linewidthDiffractionDislocationAnisotropyMagnetic anisotropyFerromagnetismPhysicsOpticsMagnetizationMagnetic field

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The static and dynamic properties of magnetic Pd/Fe(001) ultrathin film crystalline structures prepared on GaAs(001) templates were investigated by ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) from 10 to 73 GHz. It will be shown that the formation of a self-assembled nanoscale network of misfit dislocations in crystalline structures can be detected during the growth by fan-out diffraction features in reflection high electron energy diffraction. This network of defects leads to a strong extrinsic magnetic damping. The out-of-plane measurements of the FMR linewidth have revealed that the extrinsic damping is caused by two-magnon scattering. The contribution to the FMR linewidth from two-magnon scattering is strongly anisotropic and follows the rectangular symmetry of the glide planes of the misfit dislocation network. It will be shown that the observed strong anisotropy in two-magnon scattering can be interpreted by Fourier components of magnetic defects. The angular dependence of the Fourier components results in an effective channelling of scattered spin waves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.001

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations151
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review BSame topicMagnetic properties of thin filmsFrench-language works237,207