Experimental cyclic loading of concentric HSS braces
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During earthquake ground motion, diagonal braces in braced frames are subject to a series of cyclic loadings, alternately tension and compression. The brace can buckle and deform plastically, dissipating energy with damage accumulating in the steel. Eventually a crack may form and the brace fractures. To optimize energy dissipation, the effects of brace and gusset plate dimensions (thickness and length of the gusset plate, size of the brace, length of the brace), and material properties, on brace behaviour, need to be understood. Ten concentric bracing members, designed according to the weak brace – strong gusset concept, were tested. The objective was to investigate the effects of displacement history, brace effective slenderness ratio, and brace width/thickness ratio, on the hysteresis behaviour of bracing members. Displacement history was found to affect energy dissipation and fracture life. The effects of increasing the gusset plate thickness on the energy dissipation and the fracture life is not the same as reducing the effective slenderness ratio of the bracing member resulted from reducing the length of the HSS. New fracture life and energy life equations are proposed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".