Modulation bandwidth of semiconductor lasers based on coupled quantum wells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The effect of well coupling on differential gain and maximum‐modulation bandwidth for semiconductor lasers based on coupled quantum wells is analyzed using the K ‐factor method. We determine differential gain in coupled quantum wells within the self‐consistent solution of the Poisson, Schroedinger, and 4 × 4 Luttinger–Kohn equations. The multiple‐body effects of bandgap renormalization, coulombic scattering interactions, and a nonMarkovian distribution are also included. The analysis has been performed for coupled wells at 1.55 μm in an InGaAsP/InP lattice‐matched system grown in the [001] direction. Our results suggest that in order to maximize modulation bandwidth and differential gain, one should design structures with barrier widths larger than 40 Å. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microwave Opt Technol Lett 42: 272–274, 2004; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/mop.20275
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".