MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Stability Analysis for Generalized Neutral-Type Neural Networks

2011· article· en· W1972786144 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Mechanics and Materials · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks Stability and Synchronization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsType (biology)Artificial neural networkLinear matrix inequalityStability (learning theory)MathematicsControl theory (sociology)Exponential stabilityMatrix (chemical analysis)Stability conditionsApplied mathematicsComputer scienceMathematical optimizationNonlinear systemArtificial intelligenceControl (management)Machine learningStatisticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The issue of asymptotic stability is discussed for generalized neutral-type neural networks with time-varying delays. A new stability condition is presented based on the Lyapunov-Krasovskii method and the inequality technique, which is dependent on the amount of delay. The proposed result is given in the form of a linear matrix inequality (LMI). Finally, an example is given to illustrate our result. This result is of great significance in designs and applications of globally stable of generalized neutral-type neural networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.807
Threshold uncertainty score0.580

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it