MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972786775 · doi:10.4000/ethiquepublique.860

Des cours ontariennes ont dit oui à la prière, dans une perspective interculturelle

2011· article· fr· W1972786775 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Solange Lefebvre

Bibliographic record

VenueÉthique Publique · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dieu a une place discrète dans la vie publique canadienne, dans le préambule de la Constitution, dans des devises, des prières, des ser­ments. Des symboles chrétiens se trouvent par ailleurs présents un peu partout : par exemple, dans la fleur de lys, dans l’architecture et les symboles du bâtiment de l’Assemblée nationale du Québec. Quant à la prière des élus au début d’une assemblée politique, a-t-elle un effet discriminatoire sur les membres du public y assistant et ne croyant pas dans un être supérieur ou plus généralement non chrétiens ? D’abord, je réfléchirai aux points de vue en jeu pour ensuite détailler les prières et leur contexte, avant de terminer en commentant les décisions ontariennes, méconnues au Québec.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score0.539

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0260.022
Scholarly communication0.0100.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉthique PubliqueSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207