MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972789018 · doi:10.1179/096797801681134

Effect of cryolite on formation of Al <sub>2</sub> O <sub>3</sub> /Al composites produced by oxidation of molten Al–Mg alloy

2001· article· en· W1972789018 on OpenAlex
C. Allaire

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Ceramic Transactions · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAluminum Alloys Composites Properties
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersCentre québécois de recherche et de développement de l’aluminiumPolytechnique Montréal
KeywordsThermogravimetric analysisCryoliteMaterials scienceMolten saltMetallurgyCrucible (geodemography)AlloyComposite numberDifferential thermal analysisChemical engineeringComposite materialAluminiumChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstractThe oxidation of molten Al–5 wt-%Mg and Al–5 wt-%Mg–0·5 wt-%cryolite (Na3AlF6) has been investigated by carrying out crucible corrosion tests under thermal gradient conditions. Two morphologies of Al2O3/Al composite were observed: ‘large balls’ in the absence of cryolite; and small mushrooms in the presence of this salt. Microstructural analysis and thermogravimetric measurements were also carried out to study the effect of cryolite on the oxidation mechanism. The results showed that both composite morphologies are the result of the same directed metal oxidation (DIMOX) process (DIMOX is a trademark of Lanxide Corporation, Newark, DE). Thermogravimetric analysis also confirmed that two morphologies formed under different oxidation kinetic conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it