MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972802940 · doi:10.2514/1.t4428

Thermal Spreading Resistance Inside Anisotropic Plates with Arbitrarily Located Hotspots

2014· article· en· W1972802940 on OpenAlexafffund
Ali Gholami, Majid Bahrami

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicThermal properties of materials
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAnisotropySuperposition principleMaterials scienceThermal resistanceThermalHeat sinkParametric statisticsMechanicsSpreading resistance profilingMechanical engineeringHeat transferOpticsPhysicsMeteorologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Graphite-based anisotropic materials are becoming the key component of next-generation cooling systems in electronics and telecommunication industries. Proper use of these materials in the form of thermal spreaders, compared to conventional metallic ones, can significantly reduce the thermal stress and thermal resistance in the system. In this study, a new analytical model for temperature distribution inside anisotropic rectangular plates subjected to multiple sources and sinks on the top and bottom surfaces is presented. All lateral faces are assumed insulated. The solution is first justified for the case with single hotspots on each side and then using the superposition principle, it is extended into the general form to cover multihotspot cases. The model is validated by numerical simulation data and a perfect agreement is observed. Thermal spreading resistance is defined for the anisotropic plate and a comprehensive parametric study for optimization purpose is performed. The influence of both anisotropy and geometrical parameters on the resistance is discussed in detail and critical values are evaluated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Thermophysics and Heat TransferSame topicThermal properties of materialsFrench-language works237,207