Revealing System Dynamics through Decomposition of the Perturbation Domain in Two-Dimensional Correlation Spectroscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A technique is presented to simply and effectively decompose the perturbation domain in two-dimensional (2D) correlation maps calculated on a given set of vibrational spectra. Decomposition of the perturbation domain exposes a wealth of kinetic information complementary to the information extracted from conventional 2D correlation spectroscopy. It is shown that the technique produces "perturbation profile maps" that can be utilized in both the interpretation of the conventional 2D correlation maps and the independent kinetic analysis of the given system. Discrimination between spectral features exhibiting similar, but not identical, dynamics is facilitated by the decomposition, and spectral features exhibiting identical dynamics over the perturbation interval are quickly identified. Spectral features exhibiting similar dynamics over only a sub-range of the full perturbation are also identifiable. Interpretation of phase information illuminated in synchronous and asynchronous maps is simplified. Comparison between similar spectral features present in different samples is facilitated with the technique. The simplicity and ease of implementation of the technique make decomposition of the perturbation domain a valuable addition to the tools available in 2D correlation analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".