MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972848023 · doi:10.3828/bjcs.18.1.7

Representations of Canada's Social Prospects to British Middle-class Emigrants in Susanna Moodie's <i>Roughing It in the Bush</i> (1852)

2005· article· en· W1972848023 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Françoise Le Jeune

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Canadian Studies · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmigrationMiddle classColonialismHistoryNarrativeGender studiesSociologyLiteratureLawPolitical scienceArtArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Before migrating from England to Canada West or to British Columbia in the late 1850s and 1860s, many middle-class emigrants had read the colonial testimonies or colonial autobiographies which were then available in Britain. I will begin by studying this new popular genre and more particularly the volumes written by female middle-class emigrants who, for the first time, revealed the living conditions awaiting men and women of their own class in British North America, should they make the 'painful' choice of emigration. Then I will analyse one of the most famous colonial autobiographies, Susanna Moodie's Roughing it in the Bush. Her book, published in England in 1852, became very popular among aspiring middle-class emigrants. I will pay attention to the didactic message and representations Mrs Moodie conveys to her readers about Canada and its social prospects for penniless educated genteel families. The personal narrative of her new life as an emigrant in the New World can be read as a religious and spiritual quest for a better world, while leaving behind a money-driven Old World. In her representations of the New World, she endowed Canada with many moral virtues and definitely praised the social qualities of this new 'city upon the hill'. She even sang its meritocratic merits in patriotic overtones and heralded an age of Social Christianity for Canada, against the social and moral demons represented by the Old Mother Country. However, the representations she gives of Canada are not destined to the British reading public as a whole. She selects the emigrants she deems 'worthy' of this New (Christian) World among the 'honest sons of poverty', that is, distressed genteel families like hers, who were forced to emigrate because of social and financial contingencies. She encouraged these people to leave the Old World behind and to join other 'deserving' emigrants in Canada by promising them the Bourgeois Dream they had failed to achieve at home, only after experiencing some spiritual and physical hardship in the backwoods. Such representations must have had an impact on the emigrants' decision to emigrate and on their choice of a final destination in Canada, Canada West or British Columbia. IN THE COURSE OF RESEARCH on colonial discourses by middle-class women who emigrated to Canada after 1815, I came to study private letters written by female emigrants who had settled in British Columbia in the 1850s and 1860s. The colonies of British Columbia and Vancouver Island were later developments within the British Empire, as they were created respectively in 1849 and in 1858. This meant that before settling in these 'jewel(s) of the Crown' - as they were described in emigration pamphlets - English middle-class emigrants had had the opportunity to select their destination from among other Canadian colonies before heading West. In reading their private correspondence, one understands that these educated emigrants made a conscious decision to move to the Pacific coast after reviewing the pros and cons of each Eastern or Maritime colony. Men and women - as the life decision to emigrate had become a family choice for Victorian couples - mention having read several books on emigration among the large number available in England in the 1850s in order to get a clearer view of the opportunities offered in Canada.1 Unlike the previous generation of genteel families who had settled in Canada between 1815 and the 1840s, when only pamphlets and a few travel narratives were available, middle-class families considering emigration to the New World benefited in the 1850s and '60s from first-hand experience in the form of personal accounts written by emigrants. But what representation of Canada were they given in published travel narratives? Typically, between 1815 and 1840, the main literature on Canada provided for settlers had been limited to the publication of emigration pamphlets written by individuals or promoted by the Colonial Office or, in the 1830s, by publishers sponsored by the Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.314

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0430.012
Scholarly communication0.0110.002
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of Canadian StudiesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207