MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972892844 · doi:10.1063/1.3259973

Generalizations of the Young–Laplace equation for the pressure of a mechanically stable gas bubble in a soft elastic material

2009· article· en· W1972892844 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Mixing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBubbleLaplace pressureIsotropySurface tensionMechanicsMaximum bubble pressure methodLaplace transformLaplace's equationClassical mechanicsSpherical shellThermodynamicsEquation of stateRADIUSDeformation (meteorology)PhysicsShell (structure)Materials scienceMathematicsMathematical analysisOpticsComposite materialDifferential equation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Young-Laplace equation for the pressure of a mechanically stable gas bubble is generalized to include the effects of both surface tension and elastic forces of its surroundings. The latter are taken to be comprised of a soft isotropic material. Generalizations are derived for conditions of constant external pressure and constant system volume. The derived equations are formally exact for a spherical bubble surrounded by a spherical shell of isotropic material, provided that the bubble is sufficiently large for the surface tension to be treated macroscopically, and that the bubble radius is much larger than the thickness of the bubble/soft material interface. The underlying equations are also used to derive a simple expression for the Gibbs free energy of deformation of an elastic medium that surrounds a gas bubble. The possible relevance of this expression to some recently published ideas on decompression sickness ("the bends") is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.466
Threshold uncertainty score0.135

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it