L’entrepreneuriat social en France : un renouvellement des discours et des pratiques au sein du secteur associatif ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article entend questionner l’émergence et le développement de la thématique de l’entrepreneuriat social en France en analysant plus particulièrement les activités menées par les membres du Mouvement des entrepreneurs sociaux (Mouves). Quelles sont les propriétés sociales des « entrepreneurs sociaux » regroupés au sein du Mouves, quelles sont leurs visions du monde ? Quelles tensions leurs discours et leurs pratiques suscitent-ils auprès des représentants du secteur de l’économie sociale et solidaire (ESS) ? Dit autrement, cette communication analyse comment la mobilisation de la thématique de l’entrepreneuriat social par les membres du Mouves contribue à renouveler les discours et les pratiques au sein du champ de l’ESS – et plus particulièrement du secteur associatif – dans un contexte de reconfiguration de l’action de l’État social.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".