MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1972900669 · doi:10.1118/1.3182656

TH‐D‐BRD‐02: Convolution‐Superposition Dose Calculations with GPUs

2009· article· en· W1972900669 on OpenAlexaff
Sami Hissoiny, Benoı̂t Ozell, Philippe Després

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceAccelerationCUDAParallel computingPortingComputational scienceGraphicsConvolution (computer science)SoftwareComputer graphics (images)Operating systemArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: To study the impact in terms of execution time and accuracy of using graphics hardware for calculating the dose in a treatment planning system. The architecture of Graphics Processing Units (GPU) is well suited for numerical tasks that are intrinsically parallel, such as dose calculations. Method and Materials: This work was made within the framework of PlanUNC, or PLUNC, a treatment planning system developed and maintained by the Department of Radiation Oncology of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill for research and development purposes. The objective was to transparently integrate a GPU dose calculation engine to PLUNC. The CUDA platform from NVIDIA was used for the GPU implementation. A convolution/superposition (CS) dose calculation algorithm was ported by developing programs (called kernels) that are executed on the GPU. Firstly, the CS engine of PLUNC was directly ported to the GPU, with the original code preserved as much as possible. Secondly, parts of the original algorithm were redesigned to better exploit the massively parallel architecture of GPUs. The numerical experiments were conducted with a NVIDIA GeForce GTX280 and an Intel Q6600 CPU. Results: Acceleration factors of 10× to 20× were achieved with the GPU implementation relative to the CPU version with the direct port of the CS algorithm. The numerical accuracy of the results was preserved with the GPU implementation. A 40× acceleration factor was obtained for the TERMA calculation subroutine, which was rewritten with the GPU architecture in mind. These acceleration factors were sufficient to significantly improve the responsiveness of the PLUNC graphical interface. Conclusion: This work demonstrates the potential of graphics hardware for dose calculation in treatment planning systems. This could in turn have a significant impact on optimization strategies for complex delivery techniques such as IMRT. Research sponsored by Varian Medical Systems, Inc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical Physics→Same topicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques→French-language works237,207→