Plus ça change... Reagan, Bush et le rôle des États-Unis dans le monde
Bibliographic record
Abstract
À partir d’une analyse de contenu des messages présidentiels sur l’état de l’Union de 1982 à 1992, cet article cherche à identifier et à expliquer une quelconque redéfinition du rôle des États-Unis dans le monde à la suite des bouleversements systémiques de la dernière décennie. L’opérationnalisation du concept de rôle selon quatre dimensions fait ressortir la cohérence du discours de chaque président. Mais cette analyse remet aussi en cause la pertinence des variables systémiques pour l’explication de la dynamique du rôle national. Les caractéristiques de ce dernier sont relativement stables ou n’évoluent pas suivant les tendances attendues. Le système international offre l’occasion de changements, mais d’autres variables — cognitives, idéologiques ou plébiscitaires — pourraient mieux expliquer la volonté de les entreprendre et leur contenu.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".