MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972916223 · doi:10.1159/000198817

Adrenergic and Cholinergic Interactions in Rat Gastric Somatostatin and Gastrin Release

2009· article· en· W1972916223 on OpenAlexaff
H. Koop, Irmtraut Behrens, E. Bothe, Christopher H.S. McIntosh, Raymond A. Pederson, Rudolf Arnold, W. Creutzfeldt

Bibliographic record

VenueDigestion · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicIon Transport and Channel Regulation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndocrinologyGastrinInternal medicineSomatostatinCholinergicAcetylcholineStimulationAtropineG cellAdrenergicCarbacholSecretionChemistryBiologyMedicineReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The interactions of adrenergic and cholinergic influences on the gastric D cell were studied using an isolated perfused rat stomach in vitro. The sevenfold increase in the release of somatostatin-like immunoreactivity (SLI) in response to isoproterenol (4 . 10(-8) M) was dose-dependently inhibited by acetylcholine (10(-5) to 10(-8) M) whereas gastrin levels increased in a dose-dependent manner. Both inhibition of stimulated SLI and augmentation of gastrin release were completely abolished by atropine (10(-6) M). Isoproterenol (8 . 10(-9) M)-induced stimulation of SLI secretion was not altered by atropine. Antral exclusion completely eliminated gastrin secretion but basal and beta-adrenergic stimulated SLI release was not influenced. It is concluded that (1) cholinergic agonism reverses the stimulatory action of adrenergic agonists on the D cell, and (2) SLI from the rat stomach in vitro originates almost exclusively in the fundic region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigestionSame topicIon Transport and Channel RegulationFrench-language works237,207