MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972921184 · doi:10.2118/0913-0127-jpt

Advancements in Completion Technology Increase Production in the Williston Basin

2013· article· en· W1972921184 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Chris Carpenter

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Petroleum Technology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompletion (oil and gas wells)GeologyOil shaleDrillingStructural basinDirectional drillingPetroleumTight oilMining engineeringPetroleum engineeringPaleontologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article, written by JPT Technology Editor Chris Carpenter, contains highlights of paper SPE 159586, ’Advancements in Openhole-Completion Technology Increase Efficiencies and Production in the Williston Basin,’ by John Paneitz, Whiting Petroleum, and C. Christopher Johnson, Matthew White, and George Gentry, Baker Hughes, prepared for the 2012 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 8-10 October. The paper has not been peer reviewed. Over the years, hybrid systems have been installed in horizontal wellbores to increase the number of compartmental sections for hydraulic fracturing because of the limitations of ball-actuated fracture sleeves. Experimenting with hybrid systems provides operators with the ability to optimize spacing of fracture stages along the horizontal section when sleeve technology alone does not allow for the desired number of stages. The costs are higher for operators to perform a hybrid-type completion, however, and this has driven enhanced sleeve technology to allow for all-sleeve completions. Introduction The Bakken shale located in the Williston basin covers an area that includes portions of North Dakota and Montana in the US and Manitoba and Saskatchewan in Canada (Fig. 1). An unconventional reservoir, the Bakken formation is one of the last giants to be discovered in North America. The US Geological Service estimates that the undiscovered US portion of the Bakken formation holds 3.65 billion bbl of oil, 1.85 Tcf of associated gas, and 148 million bbl of natural-gas liquids. Advances in horizontal drilling of extended-reach wells and in completion techniques have increased the amount of recoverable oil and gas. Wells drilled in the Bakken are typically drilled horizontally across two 640-acre sections, with laterals that can extend more than 9,000 ft. Two completion methods known for cost-effectiveness and high well efficiency that are used in these wells are the openhole-packer system and the sleeve one-trip system. Openhole-Packer and Sleeve Completions Openhole completions performed in the Bakken are commonly run as a one-trip system on drillpipe containing the following equipment: a hydraulic or mechanical running tool, liner-top packer or liner-hanger system, openhole packers, fracture sleeves, and float equipment. Once the system is in position, the appropriate fluid is displaced, and the liner-top-packer is set; the running tool is dis-connected from the system and removed from the well. The openhole packers pro-vide compartmental isolation along the horizontal wellbore with fracture sleeves placed at each stage, forming a pathway for stimulation fluid and the production of hydrocarbons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.581
Threshold uncertainty score0.347

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Petroleum TechnologySame topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir AnalysisFrench-language works237,207