Bis(trichlorophosphine)iminium salts, [Cl<sub>3</sub>P=N=PCl<sub>3</sub>]<sup>+</sup>, with transition metal halide counter-ions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The structures of four bis(trichlorophosphine)iminium [[Cl(3)P=N=PCl(3)](+); systematic name: trichloro[(trichlorophosphoranylidene)iminio]phosphorus(V)] salts, namely bis(trichlorophosphine)iminium hexachloroniobate, (Cl(6)NP(2))[NbCl(6)], (I), bis(trichlorophosphine)iminium hexachlorotantalate, (Cl(6)NP(2))[TaCl(6)], (II), bis(trichlorophosphine)iminium tri-micro-chloro-bis[trichlorotitanium(IV)], (Cl(6)NP(2))[Ti(2)Cl(9)], (III), and bis[bis(trichlorophosphine)iminium] di-micro-chloro-bis[tetrachlorozirconium(IV)], (Cl(6)NP(2))(2)[Zr(2)Cl(10)], (IV), have been determined. The P=N distances in the discrete [Cl(3)P=N=PCl(3)](+) moieties in structures (I), (II) and (IV) range from 1.5460 (14) to 1.5554 (16) A, and the P=N=P angles range from 136.8 (3) to 143.4 (4) degrees. The [Cl(3)P=N=PCl(3)](+) cation in (III) is disordered and the calculated geometries for the cation are therefore less reliable. Compounds (I) and (II) are isostructural and the metal anions have slightly distorted octahedral geometries. The anion in compound (III) consists of two distorted octahedral Ti centres linked by three micro (2)-Cl atoms, while in compound (IV), the dianion is derived from two distorted edge-shared ZrCl(6) octahedra.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it