MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972948769 · doi:10.1002/etc.5620200322

Separation and characterization of gall bladder bile metabolites from speckled trout,<i>Salvelinus fontinalis</i>, exposed to individual polycyclic aromatic compounds

2001· article· en· W1972948769 on OpenAlexaff
James D. Leonard, Jocelyne Hellou

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAquaculture Nutrition and Growth
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSalvelinusFontinalisTroutGallToxicokineticsZoologyBiologyEnvironmental chemistryChemistryFish <Actinopterygii>EcologyFisheryBiochemistryMetabolism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Speckled trout, Salvelinus fontinalis, were orally exposed to individual polycyclic aromatic compounds (PACs) represented by benzo[a]pyrene, carbazole, chrysene, dibenzofuran, dibenzothiophene, fluorene, phenanthrene, and pyrene. Fish were sacrificed 7 d after exposure and the gall bladder removed for bile analysis. High pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) with fluorescence (F) and ultraviolet (UV) detection was used to determine the presence of PAC derivatives in the bile without pretreatment. Glucuronide conjugates were predominant in all exposures with variable amounts (0-53%) of phenols and starting material. Identification of compounds was confirmed by selective extraction of less polar nonconjugated PACs and enzymatic hydrolysis of water-soluble material. This was followed by HPLC and/or gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GCMS) characterization of the produced phenols. Total metabolite levels varied widely among compounds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Toxicology and ChemistrySame topicAquaculture Nutrition and GrowthFrench-language works237,207