MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972949512 · doi:10.1177/006996670003400301

The government the jāti and the individual: Rights, discipline and control in the Pune Kotwal Papers, 1766-94

2000· article· en· W1972949512 on OpenAlex
Nikita Wagle

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueContributions to Indian Sociology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSouth Asian Studies and Conflicts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)SensibilityIntervention (counseling)Control (management)Public administrationSociologyPolitical scienceSocial controlLawSocial scienceManagementPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article is based on the Pune Kotwal's papers from 1766 to 1794. The cases cited here indicate the interaction of the level of authority in local and urban Indian society, and the fluid response of authority to the needs and requirements of the society. The individual, the jāti and the government formed a dialogue on the working of social norms and sensibility within Indian society. Their response to one another at any given time reflected the inter play between rights, duties, obligations and authority that had evolved within the indige nous society in Maharashtra by the early 19th century, prior to the intervention of the British. The article also suggests the all-pervasive nature of the government in controlling the affairs of the jātis and individuals, notwithstanding their social status.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.816
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it