MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972950306 · doi:10.1016/j.molonc.2007.09.001

A consolidated catalogue and graphical annotation of dbSNP polymorphisms in the human tissue kallikrein (<i>KLK</i>) locus

2007· article· en· W1972950306 on OpenAlexafffund
Carolyn A. Goard, Irvin L. Bromberg, Marc B. Elliott, Eleftherios P. Diamandis

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Oncology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema
Canadian institutionsMount Sinai HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLocus (genetics)GeneticsdbSNPBiologyAnnotationComputational biologyGeneGenotypeSingle-nucleotide polymorphism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The human tissue kallikreins, 15 secreted serine proteases, may play diverse roles in pathophysiology. The National Center for Biotechnology Information's dbSNP was mined for polymorphisms located within the kallikrein (KLK) locus using custom-designed "ParSNPs" and "LocusAnnotator" software tools. Using "ParSNPs", a filterable catalogue of 1856 KLK polymorphisms (1023 validated) was generated. "LocusAnnotator" was used to annotate the KLK locus sequence with gene and polymorphism features. A second locus was examined to validate the use of both programs on a non-kallikrein locus. This report may assist in the informed selection of KLK polymorphisms for future association and biochemical studies in relation to disease. Furthermore, "ParSNPs" and "LocusAnnotator" are available at no cost from our website (www.acdcLab.org/annotations) to examine other loci.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.126

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0120.012
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular OncologySame topicCoagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and AngioedemaFrench-language works237,207