The Subfornical Organ: A Central Target for Circulating Feeding Signals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The mechanisms through which circulating ghrelin relays hunger signals to the CNS are not yet fully understood. In this study, we have examined the potential role of the subfornical organ (SFO), a circumventricular structure that lacks the normal blood-brain barrier, as a CNS site in which ghrelin acts to influence the hypothalamic centers controlling food intake. We report that ghrelin increased intracellular calcium concentrations in 28% (12 of 43) of dissociated SFO neurons and that the SFO expresses mRNA for the growth hormone secretagogue receptor. Whole-cell patch recordings from SFO neurons demonstrated that in 29% (9 of 31) of neurons tested ghrelin induced a mean depolarization of 7.4 +/- 0.69 mV, accompanied by an increase in action potential frequency. Voltage-clamp recordings revealed that ghrelin activates a putative nonselective cationic conductance. Previous reports that the satiety signal amylin exerts similar excitatory effects on SFO neurons led us to examine whether these two peptides influence different subpopulations of SFO neurons. Concentration-dependent depolarizing effects of amylin were observed in 59% (28 of 47) of SFO neurons (mean depolarization, 8.32 +/- 0.60 mV). In contrast to ghrelin, voltage-clamp recordings suggest that amylin influences a voltage-dependent current activated at depolarized potentials. We tested single SFO neurons with both peptides and identified cells responsive only to ghrelin (n = 9) and only to amylin (n = 7) but no cells that responded to both peptides. These data support a role for the SFO as a center at which ghrelin and amylin may influence separate subpopulations of neurons to influence the hypothalamic regulation of feeding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".