MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972980611 · doi:10.2118/09-03-15-da

Advances in Magnetic Resonance Relaxometry for Heavy Oil and Bitumen Characterization

2009· article· en· W1972980611 on OpenAlexafffund
Apostolos Kantzas

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Canadian Petroleum Technology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNMR spectroscopy and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanada Research ChairsCanadian Natural Resources Limited
KeywordsRelaxometryCharacterization (materials science)Petroleum engineeringAsphaltComputer scienceEnvironmental sciencePermeability (electromagnetism)Process engineeringConstruction engineeringGeologyNanotechnologyMaterials scienceEngineeringChemistryMagnetic resonance imaging

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper offers a summary of the advances in heavy oil and bitumen reservoir characterization and fluid stream monitoring using low field magnetic resonance tools. Both laboratory and field advances are presented. Although the bulk of the work discussed was performed in our laboratory, a selection of other pertinent technologies is also presented. This overview aims at offering the reader a quick reference of what has been achieved in the past ten years and it is hoped that it will be used as a guide for future development in this area. Introduction Low field nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) relaxometry is a technology that offers significant benefits in reservoir characterization through the magnetic resonance logging tools that are offered by oil and gas service companies(1). These tools can offer measurements of porosity, permeability, mobile and bound fluids and, potentially saturations, if they are properly calibrated. This technology has been active in its latest reincarnation since the middle of the 1980s. It was originally developed with conventional oil and gas reservoirs in Texas and the North Sea. There are currently several excellent reviews and two recommended books for those interested in studying the topic in detail(1–4). Through low field NMR we measure the amount of and the mobility of hydrogen-bearing molecules. For reservoir characterization applications, such molecules translate into gas, water or oil present within a formation. Although the physics of the process are not the focus of this overview, a brief introductory summary is included. For details, the reader is directed to the references above. The measured parameters in NMR are amplitudes of hydrogenbearing signal and relaxation times of hydrogen-bearing molecules. The amplitude is directly proportional to the amount of protons present and it can be correlated to the volume or mass of fluids within the region of measurement. The relaxation time is affected by the relative mobility of the hydrogen-bearing molecules. Thus, as visocsity increases, or the surroundings of the relaxing hydrogen are restricted, then relaxation occurs faster. There are two relaxation times that can be measured: longitudinal (T1) and transverse (T2). The focus of our work deals with transverse relaxation phenomena. Figure 1 is used as the typical figure to explain different types of relaxation spectra obtained when exposing different systems in the standard pulse sequence that is used in logging and laboratory tools alike. The spectrum of bulk water (i.e. water in a beaker) is a simple narrow peak that shows relaxation at T2 of ~2,500 ms. Compared to water, bulk bitumen (viscosity of ~1,000,000 mPas at room temperature) typically relaxes with a broader peak at less than 2 ms. Thus, in principle, a beaker that is half-full of water and half-full of bitumen would show two peaks, as shown in Figure 2. Figure 1,2,3,4 (available in full paper) In this case, the oil is somewhat lighter than that of Figure 1 (viscosity of ~100,000 mPas at room temperature).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.901
Threshold uncertainty score0.295

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Canadian Petroleum TechnologySame topicNMR spectroscopy and applicationsFrench-language works237,207