The Hemostatic System and Angiogenesis in Malignancy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Coagulopathy and angiogenesis are among the most consistent host responses associated with cancer. These two respective processes, hitherto viewed as distinct, may in fact be functionally inseparable as blood coagulation and fibrinolysis, in their own right, influence tumor angiogenesis and thereby contribute to malignant growth. In addition, tumor angiogenesis appears to be controlled through both standard and non-standard functions of such elements of the hemostatic system as tissue factor, thrombin, fibrin, plasminogen activators, plasminogen, and platelets. "Cryptic" domains can be released from hemostatic proteins through proteolytic cleavage, and act systemically as angiogenesis inhibitors (e.g., angiostatin, antiangiogenic antithrombin III aaATIII). Various components of the hemostatic system either promote or inhibit angiogenesis and likely act by changing the net angiogenic balance. However, their complex influences are far from being fully understood. Targeted pharmacological and/or genetic inhibition of pro-angiogenic activities of the hemostatic system and exploitation of endogenous angiogenesis inhibitors of the angiostatin and aaATIII variety are under study as prospective anti-cancer treatments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it