Identifying the Relationship between Travel Motivation and Lifestyles among Malaysian Pleasure Tourists and Its Marketing Implications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This preliminary study attempts to profile the Malaysian domestic pleasure travel market based on lifestyles and travel motives as well as the relationship between the two constructs. This study also investigates the sources of information and other travel-related characteristics in the Malaysian pleasure travel marketplace. This study involves a questionnaire-survey of 248 respondents and employed factor analyses with varimax rotation as the main statistical method. Factor analysis of 50 travel motivation items selected from previous literature reveals that there are five major forms of pleasure-motivated travel, namely, Nature, Cultural, Budget, Adventure and Freedom. Nature-motivated travel emerges as the most popular type among local tourists. This may be due to the country being rich in natural attractions. Thus, this study recommends further development of the ecotourism sector to encourage more Malaysians to spend their vacation locally. Five types of lifestyle were extracted from the factor analysis of 34 AIO statements adopted from Hawes (1988). The five factors labelled as the Satisfiers, the Dreamers, the Indoors, the Achievers and the Escapist. The Satisfiers and the Dreamers are the two most dominant types of lifestyle. Generally, domestic tourists are satisfied with their present leisure activities as well as possessing high curiosity for travelling to novel tourist destinations. At the same time, the Pearson Product-moment Correlation analysis was employed to investigate the relationships between the travel motivations and lifestyle dimension. The results show that the Dreamers have significant relationships with all five forms of travel motives. The study's findings will assist tourism industry players in developing tourist destinations based on these underlying travel motivations and lifestyles, thus segmenting and differentiating one destination from another for further success in promoting the destinations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.035 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".