MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Update on utilities and cost–utility analyses

2006· review· en· W1973067970 on OpenAlexaff
Hussein Hollands, Sanjay Sharma

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Opinion in Ophthalmology · 2006
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsHotel Dieu HospitalQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to summarize the recent and noteworthy utility studies and cost-utility analyses in the area of retina/vitreous during the period January 2004 to January 2006. RECENT FINDINGS: This review considers the cost-effectiveness of treatments for wet age-related macular degeneration, dry age-related macular degeneration, telemedicine in diabetic retinopathy, and utilities and patients with age-related macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy. SUMMARY: Utilities are being used increasingly to measure health-related quality of life. Cost-utility analyses are becoming more readily available for comparing the incremental cost-effectiveness of different ophthalmic interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.780
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.834
GPT teacher head0.618
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Opinion in OphthalmologySame topicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeFrench-language works237,207