MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973073623 · doi:10.1163/1568562052843302

A novel method to enhance the stability of alginate-poly-L-lysine-alginate microcapsules

2005· article· en· W1973073623 on OpenAlexafffund
Maggie S. Wang, Ronald F. Childs, Patricia L. Chang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biomaterials Science Polymer Edition · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic function and diabetes
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsLysineChemistryChemical engineeringSodium alginateMaterials sciencePolymer chemistryPolymer scienceBiochemistryOrganic chemistryEngineeringAmino acid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Implantation of microencapsulated recombinant cells is an alternative approach to gene therapy. These genetically-engineered cells enclosed in microcapsules to deliver therapeutic recombinant products have been effective in treating several murine models of human diseases. However, the most commonly used microcapsules fabricated from alginate ionically cross-linked with calcium suffer from loss of long-term mechanical stability. We now report on a method to improve their stability by introducing additional polymers to provide covalent linkages via photopolymerization. Vinyl monomers and a photoinitiator were allowed to diffuse into the initially formed calcium-alginate microcapsules. In situ photopolymerization in the presence of sodium acrylate and N-vinylpyrrolidone substantially enhanced their mechanical strength. After four months of storage in saline, > 70% of these capsules remained intact in the osmotic pressure test, while the un-modified alginate microcapsules totally disintegrated. Tests of their permeability to polyethylene glycol of different molecular weight and their ability to support cell survival showed that these properties remained unaffected by the photopolymerization. Hence, these microcapsules modified by adding a network of vinyl polymers are promising candidates to use for long-term delivery of recombinant gene products in this cell-based method of gene therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biomaterials Science Polymer EditionSame topicPancreatic function and diabetesFrench-language works237,207