MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Carrion Insects on Pig Carcasses at a Rural and an Urban Site in Nova Scotia

2002· article· en· W1973074052 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
George Gaylord Simpson, D.B. Strongman

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Society of Forensic Science Journal · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicForensic Entomology and Diptera Studies
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCalliphoridaePhormia reginaCarrionForensic entomologyLuciliaBiologyNova scotiaEcological successionPopulationEcologyZoologyGeographyLarvaArchaeologyDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Blow flies of the family Calliphoridae are significant insect colonizers of dead animal bodies and have proven useful in forensic investigations. The species composition and succession of insects on carcasses are affected by physical factors such as temperature, or exposure and also by the population biology of the flies. For accurate use of fly data in forensic cases it is important to establish a database of information on carrion insects for each different biogeographical area. This paper provides some baseline data for rural and urban areas of Nova Scotia over the summer period using pig carcasses under exposed, shaded and buried conditions. There was a great deal of overlap in species composition when the urban and rural sites were compared. Phormia regina was the most frequently encountered blow fly and it was present in exposed and shaded conditions at both sites. Lucilia illustris was also common at urban and rural sites while Phaenicia sericata was collected only at the urban site. Protophormia terraenovae was collected more often at the urban site. Only one species of blow fly, Cynomyopsis cadaverina, was recovered from buried pig carcasses. This result differs from most similar studies done. Some data are also included on the burying beetles and other insects associated with the carcasses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.437
Threshold uncertainty score0.974

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2002
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Society of Forensic Science JournalSame topicForensic Entomology and Diptera StudiesFrench-language works237,207