Nominally Anaerobic Corrosion of Carbon Steel in Near-Neutral pH Saline Environments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gas transmission pipeline corrosion commences when coatings disbond, exposing the steel to groundwater. When this occurs, a number of anaerobic and aerobic corrosion scenarios can be envisaged. The initial nominally anaerobic corrosion period has been investigated by applying a combination of electrochemical methods (i.e., corrosion potential, linear polarization resistance, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy [EIS] measurements) and surface analytical techniques (scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy, and Raman spectroscopy). An evolution in film properties was observed and attributed to the entry of adventitious oxygen into faults within the preformed film. This leads to an increase in overall corrosion and a change in properties of the film as detected by EIS and Raman analysis. This article describes the mechanism involved in this transition, and provides a basis for a more extensive study of the corrosion process encountered on switching between anaerobic and aerobic conditions. The overall goal of this study was to provide a mechanistic basis for the corrosion scenarios possible on gas transmission pipelines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".