Observations on Historical, Contemporary, and Natural PCDD/Fs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PCDD/Fs were determined in samples of archived surface soils collected from different locations around the world in the early 1880s, in contemporary surface soils from around the world, in archived subsurface soils collected at Rothamsted Experimental Station in the 1870/1880s, and in sections of peat core deposited between 5000 BP and the present. PCDD/Fs were detected in most of the samples. The potential sources and implications of the levels and mixtures of PCDD/Fs present in the samples are discussed. The homologue and isomer patterns observed in most of the contemporary European surface soils are commonly observed for European air samples and soil samples. The homologue pattern in the Rothamsted surface soils collected in the 1800s was similar, suggesting that similar sources of atmospheric emissions of PCDD/ Fs were operating in the UK in the 1800s as currently. Very different patterns, dominated by OCDD and with contributions of HpCDD and HxCDD, were found in some other samples. It is proposed that the PCDD/Fs present in the subsurface Rothamsted soils, archived (1880s) surface soils from Illinois and the Congo, clay beneath the peat bog (deposited approximately 5000 BP), and possibly surface soil samples from Thailand and Australia are of a natural origin. The most abundant TeCDD/F congeners measured in the peat samples here were also those observed by previous workers who studied a Canadian peat bog and are consistent with the microbially mediated oxidative coupling of chlorophenols. The study provides evidence for the widespread occurrence of PCDD/Fs in the environment prior to 1900 and for a complex array of sources (including natural) and environmental transformation processes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".