MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973109625 · doi:10.2118/08-09-65

Stability of THAI ™ Process-Theoretical And Experimental Observations

2008· article· en· W1973109625 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
M. Greaves, T.X. Xia, Alex Turta

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Canadian Petroleum Technology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCombustionAsphaltPetroleum engineeringOil sandsEnvironmental scienceFossil fuelGeologyMaterials scienceWaste managementEngineeringChemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The performance of the THAI ™ process has been investigated in numerous 3D experiments, using heavy crudes and Athabasca oil sands bitumen. The stability of the process is demonstrated by high combustion zone temperatures, absence of gas channelling, insensitivity to large changes in air injection rate, tolerance of an overlying gas cap, increased combustion temperature and faster upgrading response with increasing oil layer thickness, 'controlled gas override', own 'front tracking' capability and steady oil production rate. The most important parameters for upscaling of (stable) experimental scale performance to (stable) field scale operation are combustion front temperature and combustion front velocity. Early stage results from the WHITESANDS THAI ™ field pilot at Christina Lake, confirm high combustion zone temperatures (700 – 800 °C), high fluids production of up to 2,000 barrels per day of gross fluids (50 – 55% bitumen cut) and signs of significant partial upgrading (up to 8.2 °API). These measures of field pilot performance are consistent with the experimental findings from 3D physical experiments. They are very encouraging indicators for the future development of THAI ™on a commercial scale. Introduction There is a long and tortuous history concerning the in situ combustion (ISC) process as applied to heavy crude and oil sands reservoirs. Some parts of it were tremendously innovative and successful, but there were also many failures, often due to poorly chosen reservoirs. One of the main reasons why projects failed was lack of control of propagation of the in situ combustion front. In many cases, there was a lack of understanding of the part played by gravity, and hence gravity segregation. Since the first field test of the ISC process in 1951, more than 160 field pilots have been conducted; most of them in the period 1970 – 1990. This led to the development of both the dry and wet ISC processes. They were tested for normal heavy oil and for oil sands using air and enriched air. However, the commercial application of ISC was attained only for heavy crude reservoirs around 1970, using air injection. At that time, most operators started to realize that ISC was actually a gas displacement process, benefiting from oil viscosity reduction due to heat generated by ISC reactions. Therefore, as in any gas displacement process, the injectors should be located at the most updip position. As of April 1992, according to an Oil & Gas Journal report, the incremental daily production from ISC was approximately 4,700 BOPD (from eight projects) in the USA, 8,000 BOPD (from ten projects) in the former Soviet Union, 7,300 BOPD (from three projects) in Canada and 12,000 BOPD (from five projects) in Romania. Thus, the 1992 world incremental daily oil production due to ISC was about 32,000 BOPD (from 26 reported projects)(1, 2). This included nineteen commercial operations and seven semi-industrial projects. Currently, only four commercial heavy oil projects are active: Suplacu de Barcau (Romania), Balol and Santhal projects (India) and Bayou State Oil Corp. (BSOC) in Bellevue, Louisiana, USA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.433
Threshold uncertainty score0.472

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Canadian Petroleum TechnologySame topicPetroleum Processing and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207