Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article recasts the two rivals factions who founded modern drama in Europe's little theaters – the naturalists and the symbolists – as partners in a mutual retreat from the gigantism of the nineteenth century and its theatre. A comparison of the theatrical faits-divers of Oscar Méténier and the early one-act plays of Maurice Maeterlinck reveals that both naturalist and symbolist playwrights replaced length with intensity, reduced the amount of plot and character while increasing the role of atmosphere, and eschewed absorption in favor of concentrated suspense and effect. More surprisingly, as plays from both camps shrank, they started in certain respects to resemble their “other”: naturalist shorts revealed symbolic underpinnings, and symbolist shorts came increasingly to rely on the legibility of the material world of the stage. Like the laconic newspaper items from which they took their name, theatrical faits-divers may seem like the epitome of hard-boiled naturalism, but in fact they present parables of modern urban vulnerability whose reticence reveals symbolic overtones. Such overtones become the subject of Maeterlinck's Interior. By sealing a naturalist living room inside a dark world full of mysterious figures, Maeterlinck both defamiliarizes naturalism by revealing the unseen symbolic world it excludes but cannot ignore and illustrates symbolism's reliance on the fundamental elements of the theatre. Considered together, these minimal plays illuminate an understudied turn to brevity during the genesis of modern drama while at the same time exposing the ontological complexity of dramatic activity in general. In both camps of the early French avant-garde, drama stripped to its minimum reveals the persistent, uneasy coexistence in the theater of time-bound bodies and timeless ideas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.038 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".