MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973147416 · doi:10.1190/1.2369765

Audio‐magnetotelluric exploration for unconformity uranium deposits in the Athabasca Basin, Saskatachewan, Canada

2006· article· en· W1973147416 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Volkan Tuncer, Martyn Unsworth, Weerachai Siripunvaraporn, James A. Craven

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of CanadaUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaThailand Research FundMahidol UniversityUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsUnconformityMagnetotelluricsGeologyUraniumUranium oreGeochemistryStructural basinMining engineeringGeomorphologySedimentary rockEngineeringElectrical engineeringMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Audio-magnetotelluric (AMT) exploration is being evaluated as a tool for locating unconformity related uranium deposits in the Athabasca Basin in Canada. These uranium deposits are often located above graphitic basement conductors that can be located with electromagnetic (EM) methods. A test survey at the McArthur River Mine showed good agreement between the known location of the uranium deposit and that inferred from the AMT data. Electrical resistivity models derived by 2D inversion were validated by comparison with 3D inversion and correlation with well log data. This validation was also tested with 3D forward modeling and 2D synthetic inversions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.175

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207