MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973152334 · doi:10.1586/14737175.2013.811132

Recognition of bipolar disorder type I before the first manic episode: challenges and developments

2013· review· en· W1973152334 on OpenAlexaff
Mariane Nunes Noto, Cristiano Noto, Danilo Rocha de Jesus, André Zugman, Rodrigo B. Mansur, Arthur de Almeida Berberian, Emilie Leclerc, Roger S. McIntyre, Christoph U. Correll, Elisa Brietzke

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Review of Neurotherapeutics · 2013
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBipolar Disorder and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of TorontoCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProdromeBipolar disorderEndophenotypeManiaPsychologyPsychiatryDiseaseTreatment of bipolar disorderMedicineClinical psychologyPsychotherapistLithium (medication)PsychosisCognitionInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bipolar disorder (BD) usually follows a neurobiological progression pathway, but a relatively long interval between the first symptoms of the disorder and the correct diagnosis and treatment takes place in most patients. Strategies used to recognize BD at an early stage and even prior to the first manic episode could help identify the risk and modifying factors that influence the onset and course of disease, and improve outcomes. Drawing on current research results, this article presents considerations on risk factors for the development of BD, including genetic/familial risk, endophenotypes and clinical characteristics. Taken together, this article provides a framework and tools for research on the BD prodrome, as well as for the early recognition and timely treatment of patients prior to and immediately after the emergence of BD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.925
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Review of NeurotherapeuticsSame topicBipolar Disorder and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207