Structural properties of optimal schedules with preemption
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Scheduling problems with preemption are considered, where each operation can be interrupted and resumed later without any penalty. We investigate some basic properties of their optimal solutions. When does an optimal schedule exist (provided that there are feasible schedules)? When does it have a finite/polynomial number of interruptions? Do they occur at integral/rational points only? These theoretical questions are also of practical interest, since structural properties can be used to reduce the search space in a practical scheduling application. In this paper we answer some of these basic questions for a rather general scheduling model (including, as the special cases, the classicalmodels such as parallelmachine scheduling, shop scheduling, and resource constrained project scheduling) and for a large variety of the objective functions including nearly all known. For some two special cases of objective functions (including, however, all classical ones), we prove the existence of an optimal solution with a special “rational structure.” An important consequence of this property is that the decision versions of these optimization scheduling problems belong to class NP .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it