Doxorubicin in Lymphoma: Association Between Pharmacokinetic Variability and Clinical Response
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Despite many years of clinical use in Hodgkin lymphoma, no previous studies have evaluated the relationship between doxorubicin pharmacokinetics and clinical response. In a pilot study, we associated the area under the curve of doxorubicin with successful remission. Patients with successful remission (n = 14) had a trend toward a higher median area under the curve than those who failed remission (n = 4; 36,390 versus 19,350 ng/mL x minute, P = 0.08, respectively). Median peak serum concentrations were 73 ng/mL among failures and 280 ng/mL in those who achieved remission (P = 0.06). The 2 groups did not differ regarding demographic and clinical parameters or doxorubicin dose. If corroborated by further studies, therapeutic drug monitoring of doxorubicin may be warranted in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".