MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973216208 · doi:10.1002/cjce.22138

Dissolution characteristics of calcium‐based alkaline industrial derived wastes

2014· article· en· W1973216208 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jianli Zhao, Kuihua Han, Yingjie Li, Shengli Niu, Chunmei Lu

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndustrial Gas Emission Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDissolutionKineticsSorbentFlue-gas desulfurizationChemistryActivation energyDiffusionChemical engineeringParticle sizeMineralogyInorganic chemistryAdsorptionThermodynamicsPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurately evaluating the rate at which calcium‐based alkaline industrial derived wastes (CAIDW) dissolve is very important in the design and development of CAIDW‐type wet flue gas desulfurization plants. The dissolution characteristics of alkaline slag (AS) and salt mud (SM) have been studied using pH stat method, and the effects of various parameters such as reaction temperature, sorbent particle size and solution acidity are studied to determine the dissolution kinetics of AS and SM. The production process of CAIDW presents high influence on its dissolution performance in acidic conditions. The kinetics analysis based on the modified shrinking core model (MSCM) indicates that AS dissolution kinetics, which is accompanied by surface reaction control, follows the film diffusion, and the activation energies of the two steps are 4.62 ± 0.8 and 36.34 ± 3.1 kJ/mol, respectively. Meanwhile, the SM dissolution obeys the surface reaction model with the activation energy of 9.69 ± 1.9 kJ/mol.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.269
Threshold uncertainty score0.497

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicIndustrial Gas Emission ControlFrench-language works237,207