MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973234753 · doi:10.1117/12.2062888

Ultrabright femtosecond electron sources: perspectives and challenges towards the study of structural dynamics in labile systems

2014· article· en· W1973234753 on OpenAlexaff
Meng Gao, Hubert Jean-Ruel, Cheng Lü, Lai Chung Liu, Alexander Marx, Ryan R. Cooney, Yifeng Jiang, Günther Kassier, Gustavo Moriena, Germán Sciaini, R. J. Dwayne Miller

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFemtosecondBrightnessElectronMaterials scienceScatteringCrystallinityNanotechnologyOptoelectronicsOpticsPhysicsLaser

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The advances made in femtosecond electron sources over the last thirty years have been remarkable. In particular, the development of ultrabright femtosecond electron sources has made possible the observation of molecular motion in labile organic materials and it is paving the way towards the study of complex protein systems. The principle of radio frequency (RF) rebunching cavities for the compression of ultrabright electron pulses is presented, alongside with a recent demonstration of its capabilities in capturing the relevant photoinduced dynamics in weakly scattering organic systems. Organic and biological systems can easily decompose or lose crystallinity as a consequence of cumulative heating effects or the formation of side reaction photoproducts. Hence, source brightness plays a crucial role in achieving sufficient signal-to-noise ratio before degradation effects become noticeable on the structural properties of the material. The current brightness of electron sources in addition to the high scattering cross section of keV-MeV electrons have made femtosecond electron diffraction a powerful tool for the study of materials composed by low-Z elements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicAdvanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207