MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973361928 · doi:10.1021/ct900248a

Characterization of the Chemical Behavior of the Low Excited States through a Local Chemical Potential

2009· article· en· W1973361928 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Christophe Morell, Vanessa Labet, André Grand, Paul W. Ayers, Frank De Proft, Paul Geerlings, Henry Chermette

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chemical Theory and Computation · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsExcited stateDensity functional theoryRelaxation (psychology)Reactivity (psychology)Computational chemistrySign (mathematics)NucleophileLocalityChemical physicsElectrophileCharacterization (materials science)ChemistryStatistical physicsComputer scienceMaterials scienceQuantum mechanicsPhysicsMathematicsNanotechnologyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exploiting the locality of the chemical potential of an excited state when it is evaluated using the ground-state density functional theory (DFT), a new descriptor for excited states has been proposed. This index is based on the assumption that the relaxation of the electronic density drives the chemical reactivity of excited states. The sign of the descriptor characterizes the electrophilic or nucleophilic behavior of the atomic regions. A relation between the new descriptor and the dual descriptor is derived and provides a posteriori justification of its use to rationalize the Woodward-Hoffmann rules for photochemical reactions within the conceptual DFT. Finally, the descriptor is successfully applied to some [2 + 2] photocycloadditions, like Paterno-Büchi reactions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Chemical Theory and ComputationSame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207