Le récit de vie de vedette, L’invention d’un genre : Rigolboche, Thérésa, Paulus
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article porte sur la naissance d’un genre, le récit de vie de vedette, à partir de trois exemples, les mémoires de Rigolboche (1860), Thérésa (1865) et Paulus (1908). Il étudie la construction de ces récits et montre comment ils contribuent à élaborer un imaginaire collectif autour de la notion naissante de vedette. Rédigé à plusieurs mains, le récit de vie de vedette est une autobiographie dévoyée où la vérité et l’intimité ne sont pas des valeurs cruciales. Ces récits de vedette, du fait de leur dimension métatextuelle dévoilent, avant même que le genre ne soit pleinement activé, tous ses travers : l’obsession publicitaire, la recherche du scandale, la dimension mystificatrice…
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it