Differential mechanisms of Ca<sup>2+</sup> responses in glial cells evoked by exogenous and endogenous glutamate in rat hippocampus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The mechanisms of Ca2+ responses evoked in hippocampal glial cells in situ, by local application of glutamate and by synaptic activation, were studied in slices from juvenile rats using the membrane permeant fluorescent Ca2+ indicator fluo-3AM and confocal microscopy. Ca2+ responses induced by local application of glutamate were unaffected by the sodium channel blocker tetrodotoxin and were therefore due to direct actions on glial cells. Glutamate-evoked responses were significantly reduced by the L-type Ca2+ channel blocker nimodipine, the group I/II metabotropic glutamate receptor antagonist (S)-alpha-methyl-4-carboxyphenylglycine (MCPG), and the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist (+/-)2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid (APV). However, glutamate-induced Ca2+ responses were not significantly reduced by the non-NMDA receptor antagonist 6-cyano-7-nitro-quinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX). These results indicate that local application of glutamate increases intracellular Ca2+ levels in glial cells via the activation of L-type Ca2+ channels, NMDA receptors, and metabotropic glutamate receptors. Brief (1 s) tetanization of Schaffer collaterals produced increases in intracellular Ca2+ levels in glial cells that were dependent on the frequency of stimulation (> or =50 Hz) and on synaptic transmission (abolished by tetrodotoxin). These Ca2+ responses were also antagonized by the L-type Ca2+ channel blocker nimodipine and the metabotropic glutamate receptor antagonist MCPG. However, the non-NMDA receptor antagonist CNQX significantly reduced the Schaffer collateral-evoked Ca2+ responses, while the NMDA antagonist APV did not. Thus, these synaptically mediated Ca2+ responses in glial cells involve the activation of L-type Ca2+ channels, group I/II metabotropic glutamate receptors, and non-NMDA receptors. These findings indicate that increases in intracellular Ca2+ levels induced in glial cells by local glutamate application and by synaptic activity share similar mechanisms (activation of L-type Ca2+ channels and group I/II metabotropic glutamate receptors) but also have distinct components (NMDA vs. non-NMDA receptor activation, respectively). Therefore, neuron-glia interactions in rat hippocampus in situ involve multiple, complex Ca2+-mediated processes that may not be mimicked by local glutamate application.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".