MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973409002 · doi:10.1109/nmdc.2006.4388926

Micromagnetic simulations on current-driven domain depinning

2006· article· en· W1973409002 on OpenAlexaff
Sung-Chul Lee, E.S. Kim, Kuk-Hyun Sunwoo, Yong‐Su Kim

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic properties of thin films
Canadian institutionsSAIT Polytechnic
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurrent (fluid)Condensed matter physicsDomain wall (magnetism)Current densityMagnetic fieldPhysicsDomain (mathematical analysis)Spin-transfer torqueCritical currentDistribution (mathematics)MicromagneticsNanowireField (mathematics)TorqueMagnetic domainMagnetizationMathematical analysisMathematicsQuantum mechanicsSuperconductivity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The magnetic domain wall depinning driven by a spin transfer torque were calculated with exact current density distribution which considered the notch in the nanowire. The critical current and the critical field for domain wall depinning were calculated with exact current distribution considering notch and uniform current distribution. At a low external field, the critical current of exact current distribution is smaller by ~ 0.2 mA than that of uniform current distribution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.512
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMagnetic properties of thin filmsFrench-language works237,207