MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973418826 · doi:10.2118/2007-074

Estimation of Bitumen and Clay Content in Fine Tailings

2007· article· en· W1973418826 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Sandra Motta Cabrera, J. Bryan, Apostolos Kantzas

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian International Petroleum Conference · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNMR spectroscopy and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsTailingsOil sandsAsphaltSiltEnvironmental scienceExtraction (chemistry)DewateringWater contentGeologyGeotechnical engineeringMaterials scienceChemistryMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Fine tailings are mixtures consisting primarily of water with small amounts of bitumen, sand, silts and clays. They are the components of the tailings ponds and the by-product of the oil sand extraction process. There are concerns regarding the possible environmental implications of the tailings when they will be reclaimed. For this reason, it is important to understand not only the tailings content, but also their stability and settling properties. In this study, low field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) has been used to estimate the bitumen, clay and water content of synthetic tailings samples. Numerous samples with variable water, bitumen, sand and clay concentrations were prepared and tested in the NMR tool under ambient conditions. The amplitude and relaxation properties of water were correlated to the clay content. The experimental measurements were successful and were conducted in a matter of a few minutes. The results confirm and expand previous knowledge generated by the group and identify potential applications for on-line determination of tailings streams composition. Introduction Oil production from the oil sands in Alberta generates large volumes of solid and liquid non-usable materials that must be reclaimed. For each barrel of synthetic crude produced, about 2 tonnes of ore are processed, with a by-product of 2 m3 of processed water and 1.8 tonnes of solid tailings(1). The tailings stream is a mixture composed primarily of water, sand, silt, clays and a small amount of unrecovered bitumen. Conventionally, tailings are discharged of into ponds where the segregation between coarse sand and fine clay solids occurs. Fines are defined as minerals passing through a 325 U.S. (<44 µm) mesh sieve, and subdivided into silt-sized (2 µm< particle size <44 µm) and clay-sized (<2 µm) particles. The claysized fraction in tailings includes principally illite, kaolinite and a small fraction of sodium montmorillonite(2). In the tailings ponds, coarse sand settles rapidly while fine clay solids settle slowly. As a result, disposal of these fine tailings is a serious problem because full consolidation is estimated to take thousands of years, and the accumulated volume of mature fine tailings is expected to increase to over one billion cubic meters by the year 2020(3). Due to the large volumes of tailings, the reduction of the remaining bitumen in the tailings stream is an important environmental and production process issue. The present study focuses on the use of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) as a tool to estimate the bitumen, water and clay content in fine tailings. NMR is a non-destructive technique that is currently used to establish compositions of oil / brine emulsions and the viscosity of heavy oil and bitumen(4, 5). In addition, the NMR logging tool is used in reservoir characterization, measuring properties such as permeability(6–9), porosity(8, 9), mobile and immobile fluids(10–13), and fluid saturations(14). In comparison to other techniques such as Dean- Stark extraction, NMR provides a faster composition measurement and requires a smaller sample. Another advantage is that the NMR technique can provide compositional results on-site or may even be implemented on-line in a process, such as oil sand processing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.721
Threshold uncertainty score0.960

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian International Petroleum ConferenceSame topicNMR spectroscopy and applicationsFrench-language works237,207