Genetic Composition of <i>Phytophthora infestans</i> in Canada Reveals Migration and Increased Diversity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A dramatic increase in the incidence of late blight and changes within populations of Phytophthora infestans have been observed in various regions of Canada. In this study, the occurrence of several new genotypes of the pathogen was documented with associated phenotypes that dominated pathogen populations. Genotype US-23, previously detected only among isolates from the United States, dominated in the western Canadian provinces of British Columbia, Alberta (AB), Saskatchewan, and Manitoba (MB). Although isolates of US-23 infect both potato and tomato, these isolates were the only genotype recovered from commercial garden centers in Canada. Isolates of genotype US-8, previously dominant throughout Canada, represented the only genotype detected from the eastern Canadian provinces of New Brunswick and Prince Edward Island. Isolates of other genotypes detected in Canada included US-11 in AB, US-24 in MB, and US-22 in Ontario (ON). An additional genotype was detected in ON which appears to be a derivative of US-22 that may have arisen through sexual reproduction. However, evidence of clonal reproduction dominated among the isolates collected, and opportunities for sexual reproduction were probably limited because of a surprising geographic separation of the A1 and A2 mating types in Canada. Sensitivity of the US-22, US-23, and US-24 isolates to the fungicide metalaxyl, movement of potato seed and transplants, and weather conditions may have contributed to reduced opportunities for contact between the mating types in fields in Canada. All P. infestans isolates were readily distinguished from other related oomycetes with RG57 restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. Long-distance movement in seed tubers and garden center transplants may have contributed to the rapid spread of the P. infestans genotypes across Canada. Tracking pathogen movement and population composition should improve the ability to predict the genotypes expected each year in different regions of Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".