MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973475330 · doi:10.1039/b111451d

Ultra-fast HPLC separation of common anions using a monolithic stationary phase

2002· article· en· W1973475330 on OpenAlex
Panos Hatsis, Charles A. Lucy

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Analyst · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAnalytical Chemistry and Chromatography
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsAbsorbanceChromatographyConductivityChemistryReproducibilityDetection limitReagentAnalytical Chemistry (journal)High-performance liquid chromatographyIon chromatographyIon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, a monolithic column was used to perform ultrafast separations of common inorganic anions in as little as 15 seconds. Separations were performed using ion-interaction chromatography with tetrabutylammonium-phthalate as the ion-interaction reagent and were monitored using either direct conductivity or indirect absorbance detection. Detection limits for direct conductivity were in the low ppm range, whereas those for indirect absorbance detection were up to an order of magnitude higher. The reproducibility was 0.4% and 2% RSD for retention time and peak area, respectively, for a one minute separation, and 2.8% and 3-15%, respectively, for the 15 second separation. The proposed method was validated versus standard ion chromatography with suppressed conductivity detection for the analysis of an industrial water sample.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.254
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it