MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973498578 · doi:10.2118/72117-ms

Experience of a Reservoir Waterflood Failure and Remediation Treatment in the Stag Reservoir, Australia

2001· article· en· W1973498578 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Asia Pacific Improved Oil Recovery Conference · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsApache (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubseaPetroleum engineeringGeologyInjection wellEnvironmental scienceEngineeringGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Stag field operated by Apache Energy Limited is located on the North-West Shelf Australia. Waterflooding is used to maximise production rates and reserves recovery. An unusual failure of the reservoir occurred in late October 2000, between a subsea horizontal injector and a platform based horizontal producer, 2130 ft apart. In effect, a reservoir short-circuit was created between the wells. This reservoir failure circumvented the waterflood and had the potential to isolate reserves between the two wells. Analysis of the failure data indicates the short-circuit was caused by high stresses in the weak reservoir formation. The failure appears to be a wormhole like failure. A tracer study was implemented to provide information on the short circuit dimensions and to design a remedial treatment. The tracer took 2 hours 50 minutes to travel between wells indicating direct communication and a volume of the short circuit flow path in the order of 150-190 bbls. Lack of isolation options through the uncemented pre-perforated liners would make any re-mediation difficult and expensive. This provided motivation to first attempt remediation by a comparatively inexpensive polymer treatment injected through the subsea injector and into the short-circuit. Following the polymer treatment, a cement squeeze through the producer was performed to block the short circuit. This paper reviews the unusual reservoir failure, the tracer study, polymer treatment and subsequent cement shut-off. Included is detail on treatment designs, implementation utilising existing platform equipment and interpretations of the results. This paper is a helpful case study to those designing and implementing water shut offs, identifying waterflood problems and testing low cost re-mediation alternatives. The paper raises an alternative failure mode that could be experienced in waterflood operations in weakly consolidated reservoir rock.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.153
Threshold uncertainty score0.797

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it