MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973548423 · doi:10.1021/jp064082a

Nitrogen 1s Near-Edge X-ray Absorption Fine Structure Spectroscopy of Amino Acids:  Resolving Zwitterionic Effects

2006· article· en· W1973548423 on OpenAlexaff
Edwige Otero, Stephen G. Urquhart

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSurface Chemistry and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsXANESValence (chemistry)ChemistryX-ray absorption fine structureAb initioAbsorption spectroscopyRydberg formulaSpectroscopyExtended X-ray absorption fine structureSpectral lineAb initio quantum chemistry methodsMoleculeAmino acidQuenching (fluorescence)CrystallographyIonizationComputational chemistryOrganic chemistryPhysicsFluorescenceIon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Considerable variation is observed in the near-edge X-ray absorption fine structure (NEXAFS) spectra of amino acids. To unambiguously characterize the chemical origin of this variation, we have acquired the nitrogen 1s NEXAFS spectra of several amino acids and other model compounds and complemented these experimental measurements with ab initio calculations of isolated molecules and molecular clusters. The systematic differences observed between the zwitterionic and un-ionized forms of amino acids arise directly from the structural difference (-NH2 vs -NH3+), which leads to a change in the degree of Rydberg-valence mixing. Further change arises from quenching of this Rydberg character in the spectra of condensed amino acids. Ab initio calculations are used to explore the degree of Rydberg-valence mixing in the solid state.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry ASame topicSurface Chemistry and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207