MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973560449 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.090961

Methotrexate Has No Antifibrotic Effect in Bleomycin-induced Experimental Scleroderma

2010· letter· en· W1973560449 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Metin Özgen, Süleyman Serdar Koca, Ahmet Turan Işık, İbrahim H. Özercan

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2010
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBleomycinScleroderma (fungus)MethotrexateRheumatismPathogenesisClinical trialDiseaseSystemic sclerodermaImmunologyInternal medicineChemotherapyDermatology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To the Editor: Scleroderma is a chronic inflammatory disease that is characterized by widespread microvascular damage and excessive deposition of collagen in the skin and internal organs, although its pathogenesis is not fully understood. Opinions regarding the current treatment of scleroderma are based on recently developed European League Against Rheumatism/EULAR Scleroderma Trials and Research Group recommendations. However, no disease-modifying drugs are currently available that can modify the course of the disease. In systemic sclerosis, methotrexate (MTX) has been studied in controlled trials, with controversial outcomes1,2. We evaluated the possible effectiveness of MTX in a bleomycin (BLM)-induced experimental scleroderma model3,4. Our study included 3 groups of mice (n = 10 Balb/c mice in each group). Control group mice … Address correspondence to Dr. S. Koca; E-mail: kocassk{at}yahoo.com

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0070.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of RheumatologySame topicSystemic Sclerosis and Related DiseasesFrench-language works237,207