Monitoring and numerical investigation of a rigid inclusions–reinforced industrial building
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper describes a case history of a pile-supported industrial structure with an area improvement ratio of 2.2%. Field-monitored data from the contact pressures acting on the pile, the mattress, and underneath the concrete slab; pore-water pressures; settlements; and vertical strains in the inclusions are reported and discussed. The case history is back-analyzed by performing a three-dimensional (3D) finite difference analysis. The measured and computed results are compared and discussed. Based on the field observations of the contact stresses and pore-water pressures and the numerical simulations of the industrial structure construction, it is clear that there was a load transfer from the soil to the piles due to soil arching. The measured contact pressure acting on the pile was approximately six times higher than that acting on the soil located between the piles. Numerical predictions of the stress reduction, differential settlement, and pile strain are consistent with the measured values during construction of the industrial structure. This concurrence of the numerical and experimental data permits evaluation of these behaviors at the end of the industrial building construction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it