MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973601967 · doi:10.1586/17469872.2013.814858

An update on diagnosis and treatment of female pattern hair loss

2013· article· en· W1973601967 on OpenAlexaff
Thamer Mubki, Omar Shamsaldeen, Kevin J. McElwee, Jerry Shapiro

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Review of Dermatology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHair Growth and Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHair lossMedicineDermatoscopyScalpDermatologyFinasterideInternal medicineMelanoma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Female pattern hair loss (FPHL) is the most common cause of hair loss in women. It has a greater psychosocial morbidity than that of male pattern hair loss. The clinical presentation of FPHL is distinctive with hair thinning usually confined to the crown region of the scalp. The frontal hair line is usually spared; however, it can be affected in some patients. Miniaturization of terminal scalp hair and shortening of the anagen growth phase of the hair cycle results in growth of thinner and shorter hair fibers. Diagnosis is usually made clinically. Recent advances in digital image analysis has increased the use of dermatoscopy in the diagnosis of FPHL and as a consequence, reduced the need for doing skin biopsies. Many medical and surgical treatments are currently available with various success rates. In this review article, we discuss the major recent advances in the diagnosis and management of FPHL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Review of DermatologySame topicHair Growth and DisordersFrench-language works237,207